Investment Policy Statement
I am grateful for LivingaFI for prompting me to write down my own Investment Policy Statement (IPS). My IPS is below. I’ll set out the thinking behind it in more detail in separate blog posts (starting here).
- Diversify. In as many ways as possible.
- Tax-efficiency regarding the investment owner and account, not regarding the actual holding.
- Strong preference for liquidity, paid-out income, rising income, and low fees.
- Presumption that passive investments are better than active investments.
- Monitor progress against a target allocation; incrementally invest to rebalance underweight components; buying is much better than selling.
- Diversified against geographies bearing in mind both estimated long term time allocation and the country’s share of global public markets.
- Diversified against equities, fixed income, and cash. Bias towards equities and against cash.
- Diversified across providers, both of accounts and of ETFs/funds.
|Funds and accounts
- Exploit Mrs FIRE’s taxable allowances.
- Maximise use of tax-free ISAs for both Mr FIRE and Mrs FIRE.
- Moderate use of pensions for both Mr FIRE and Mrs FIRE, such that ideally one of us brushes the maximum asset cap and the other misses it by a bit.
- Tax-free accounts to be the preferred accounts for holding both bonds and high-yield investments; taxable accounts are preferred for holding equities and low-yielding investments.
- Partial use of offshore insurance bonds to provide flexibility, at the expense of fees
- Financial advisers used only for complex planning or access to particular financial products, never for fund/stock selection.
- Rebalance when there is surplus cash and circumstances are propitious. A drift from target allocation is too high if it is 2% of total funds or 20% of the ideal allocation, whichever is smaller (e.g. for USA fixed income: target 5%, acceptable range is +/-20% i.e. 4.0-6.0%; for USA equities: target 20%, range is +/- 2% i.e. 18-22%).
- In principle, work to reduce the number of underlying holdings. Actual holdings should be split across multiple owners and accounts.
- January 2017. U.K. Equity down weighted, U.K. Loan reduced, USA equity increased, USA loan reduced, USA and U.K. Fixed income reduced. Broadly this reduces home bias in line with the November accidental / involuntary shift that occurred when I rationalised my private banking portfolio. It also reflected reduced leverage due to significant equity gains in 2016, coupled with the fact that one of my margin loan accounts is GBP-only.
- July 2016. UK Fixed income downweighted, US loan target reduced; slight shift towards equity along with a slight reduction in leverage.
- January 2016. Major rethink, caused by the Dream Home purchase and the portfolio loan used to buy it. Shift towards lower risk, less UK-facing mix; UK downweighted (in case of Brexit), fixed income upweighted (for stability).
- April 2015. USA upweighted, UK downweighted (in frustration at paucity of attractive investments in UK). Geographic split 55/25/14/6. Asset split 80/15/5. Round numbers; fixed income jitters.
- Early 2014. Australia mildly upweighted (reasons forgotten). Geographic split 60/20/14/6. Asset split 79/15/6. Fixed income jitters.
- Late 2012. Original allocation. Geographic split 60/20/15/5; asset split 77/19/4.
Any comments or suggestions very welcome.